On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 03:13 +0200, Felix Buenemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the exact same problem with 3.2.3, y "fix" was simply
> to manually specify the spam score:
>
> # adjust for high efficiency rules
> score URIBL_BLACK 50
> score URIBL_JP_SURBL 50
> score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 50
> score RAZOR2_CHECK 50
> score BAYES_99 50
> # short circuit high efficiency rules
> shortcircuit URIBL_BLACK spam
> shortcircuit URIBL_JP_SURBL spam
> shortcircuit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET spam
> shortcircuit RAZOR2_CHECK spam
> shortcircuit BAYES_99 spam
Single rule poison-pills are FP prone. Every rule in that list *does*
have false positives.
guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
