On Saturday 13 September 2008, Felix Buenemann wrote: >Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb: >> Felix Buenemann<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> is it possible to skip scanning with spamc for large mails? (eg.> 1MB) >>> >>> I receive lots of huge mail (15-30MByte) on my server an the scanning >>> takes very long for those mails, that will be ham anyways. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Felix Buenemann >> >> <quote src="man spamc"> >> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size >> Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any >> bigger than this threshold and the message will be returned >> unprocessed (default: 500 KB). If spamc gets handed a message >> bigger than this, it won’t be passed to spamd. The maximum >> message size is 256 MB. The size is specified in bytes, as a >> positive integer greater than 0. For example, -s 500000. >> </quote> > >OK, so I looked in the totally wrong place for it. I looked into the >spamc wrapper and it actually uses -s 256000, so that can't explain long >processing times. Seems it's back to checking logs for me, thx. > >-- Felix
There are rumors floating around that the python being shipped by redhat/fedora is about 100x slower than python installed from the tarballs. Can this be confirmed? I have reduced the size of what gets sent thru SA in my .procmailrc, first to 50k a few months ago, and just now to 20k, as I am running Fedora 8 here and often have lags that can last 2-3 minutes. Am I on the right track to speed this up? The 419 and viagra spams are both out of control here, and there have been no rules updates in months that I'm aware of. Am I not on the right list to be notified? With the apparent demise of RDJ, updates have slowed to a crawl, and finally stopped, or so it appears. Thanks. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Redundant ACLs.
