Hi all,
I now have SA installed at the live machine and it seems to be running ok,
at least no bigger issues besides an error loadeding RSA.pm, which I have no
idea what it is for?
Anyway, it still let's a load of spam through. For testing, I took one of
those spams out of an inbox and applied spamassassin -D.
Result: The live-machine did not recognize it as spam, while the
test-machine did! So my question:
spamassassin -D only gives me the rules which hit, but omits those which
fail. Is there a way to further debug?
Machines have different OS (Linux and OpenBSD) and I am not sure if I can
just copy over (which I'd love to do) :)
What puzzles me:
[9045] dbg: learn: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 1
[9045] dbg: learn: auto-learn: message score: -0.001, computed score for
autolearn: 0.001
[9045] dbg: learn: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, body-points=0.001,
head-points=0.001, learned-points=0
[9045] dbg: learn: auto-learn? yes, ham (0.001 < 0.1)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[9045] dbg: learn: initializing learner
[9045] dbg: learn: learning ham
[9045] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval=HASH(0x9628d2c)
implements 'check_wb_list', priority 0
[9045] dbg: eval: all '*From' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[9045] dbg: eval: all '*To' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[9045] dbg: locker: safe_lock: created
/root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.proxy1.tvwerk.de.9045
[9045] dbg: locker: safe_lock: trying to get lock on
/root/.spamassassin/bayes with 0 retries
[9045] dbg: locker: safe_lock: link to /root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock: link
ok
[9045] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/W /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[9045] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/W /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
[9045] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[9045] dbg: bayes: learned
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', atime: 1220534086
[9045] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
[9045] dbg: bayes: files locked, now unlocking lock
[9045] dbg: locker: safe_unlock: unlink /root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock
[9045] dbg: learn: initializing learner
[9045] dbg: check: is spam? score=-0.001 required=5
[9045] dbg: check: tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS
[9045] dbg: check:
subtests=__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT,__DOS_HAS_ANY_URI,__EXCLAIM_SUBJ,__FH_HAS_XMSMAIL,__FH_HAS_XPRIORITY,__FRAUD_DBI,__HAS_ANY_URI,__HAS_MIMEOLE,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_MSMAIL_PRI,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS_X_MAILER,__HTML_LENGTH_0000_1024,__JM_REACTOR_XMOLE,__MIMEOLE_MS,__MIME_HTML,__MIME_QP,__MIME_VERSION,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_DOLLARS_MAYBE,__MSGID_DOLLARS_OK,__MSGID_OK_HEX,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__MSGID_RANDY,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__OE_MSGID_2,__SANE_MSGID,__TAG_EXISTS_BODY,__TAG_EXISTS_HEAD,__TAG_EXISTS_HTML,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_BODY,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP,__UNUSABLE_MSGID,__XM_MS_IN_GENERAL
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on proxy1.tvwerk.de
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,
NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
From: "Ayomide Acton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: The best offer!
Does that mean, it is considered ham?
