-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:11:09 -0500 > Von: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Dirk Bonengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: iXhash plugin and lists - feedback wanted
> On Monday 04 August 2008 4:13 pm, Dirk Bonengel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a > > variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines of the NiXSpam project (run > > by the German IT magazine iX). > > I also run two DNS zones > > (nospam.login-solutions.de,nospam.login-solutions.ag), containing fuzzy > > checksum data from various spam traps. > > > > Now, I'll leave my current job where I had the opportunity to run a > > dedicated server to maintain the lists. > > I wonder if it it is worth my while to actually migrate to whole stuff > > (and expand it to contain data from other sources) or to just release a > > final version of the plugin and call it quits. > > > > I guess this list is the best place to ask those of you who use the > > plugin for feedback. I'd appreciate any comments and information an hit > > rates, FPs and such > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Dirk > Hi Dirk, I've been using it on my home system probably ever since you made > it > available. Below are hit stats from yesterday: > > Total: 279 > Ham: 122 > Spam: 157 > > iXhash.cf: > Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of > Ham %of Spam > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > LOGINHASH 4.50 30 62 > 24.59% 39.49% > LOGINHASH2 2.50 30 61 > 24.59% 38.85% > IXHASH 2.50 31 66 > 25.41% 42.04% > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > OVERALL 31 66 > 25.41% 42.04% > > Though it does hit ham, I don't remember ever seeing any FP's because of > it. > I'd say expand it, though again, this is just running on a home system > with > one user, me. > > Keep up the good work > > Chris > > -- > Chris > KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C Chris, from my experience there must be something wrong with your setup. From the feedback I got thus far the plugin is quite accurate where FPs are concerned. Thus the relatively high scores I set in the default config. I'd recommend having a look at your DNS setup - maybe your provider returns false results. Using OpenDNS e.g. has caused such high FP rates in the past. Let me know if I can help. Dirk -- GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
