Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-07-24 04:54:58, schrieb Michael Scheidell:
amazon.com has a decade long history of spamming and should not be in
the def_whitelist_from_spf or dnswl.
they have a history of rfc abuse (the bounce emails to abuse@, with 'if
you wish to report fraud or phish, go to this url, jump though these
hoops), or just bounce their abuse@ address due to a full mail box. (if
they didn't spam, their abuse box would not be so full)
Better way (I used it on <uol.com.br>) is to collect all E-Mails of
Amazon Employees and services and whenever a abuse-bounce come in,
forward it to ALL addresses at the same time.
forget it. As usual, Michael was in a bad mood. He provided no evidence
for his accusations...
UOL was spaming MANY Debian mailinglistst and after 6 of 7 listusers
have used my advice the UOL problem was gone... (we have send nearly
300.000 messages in 2 days to UOL)
Currently I am hit by several 10.000 "mailer-daemon" and "postmaster"
per day and since it is holiday... :-D
out of curiosity, what is the ratio from "large PSs"?
I have time to collect E-Mails...
vive les vacances :)
If you wish to report a suspected spoofed e-mail or phishing attempt,
please visit:
http://www.amazon.com/phish
Nice, specialy if you have no Webaccess but EMail... (I am on GSM)
they violate federal can spam laws:
federal can what? kezako? sarkozi
no removes, no full physical address in spam, sending from unattended
email box.
Sue them?
exactly!