Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-07-24 04:54:58, schrieb Michael Scheidell:
amazon.com has a decade long history of spamming and should not be in the def_whitelist_from_spf or dnswl.

they have a history of rfc abuse (the bounce emails to abuse@, with 'if you wish to report fraud or phish, go to this url, jump though these hoops), or just bounce their abuse@ address due to a full mail box. (if they didn't spam, their abuse box would not be so full)

Better way (I used it on <uol.com.br>) is  to  collect  all  E-Mails  of
Amazon Employees and services  and  whenever  a  abuse-bounce  come  in,
forward it to ALL addresses at the same time.


forget it. As usual, Michael was in a bad mood. He provided no evidence for his accusations...


UOL was spaming MANY Debian mailinglistst and after  6  of  7  listusers
have used my advice the UOL problem was gone...  (we  have  send  nearly
300.000 messages in 2 days to UOL)

Currently I am hit by several 10.000  "mailer-daemon"  and  "postmaster"
per day and since it is holiday...  :-D


out of curiosity, what is the ratio from "large PSs"?

I have time to collect E-Mails...


vive les vacances :)

If you wish to report a suspected spoofed e-mail or phishing attempt, please visit:
http://www.amazon.com/phish

Nice, specialy if you have no Webaccess but EMail...  (I am on GSM)

they violate federal can spam laws:

federal can what? kezako? sarkozi

no removes, no full physical address in spam, sending from unattended email box.

Sue them?

exactly!



Reply via email to