> > > Heh, in my case I really don't like having to re-train anything. I like > to be sure when I train that if I tell sa-learn that a mail is spam, it > is 100% spam. That's why I weekly collect spammy mail from a bunch of > trusted users and re filter it myself before passing it to sa-learn. >
Diego and list, Isn't the timeliness of the training of spam important? Isn't spam trained immediately (close to realtime) more effective than spam trained well after spammer mail runs? - rh
