From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Benny Pedersen wrote: >> http://www.openspf.org/Why?id=me%40junc.org&ip=194.116.240.69&receiver=athena.apache.org > >On that page it says: > > athena.apache.org received a message from mx.grupointercom.com > (194.116.240.69) that claimed an envelope sender address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > However, the domain junc.org has declared using SPF that it does not > send mail through mx.grupointercom.com (194.116.240.69). That is why > the message was rejected.
>What did you do differently between this message and the one that was >rejected? Somehow you routed the other message through an >unauthorized route. It is specifically configured to be rejected by >your own domain configuration. Routine mail through grupointercom.com >makes it look like a forgery. I got similar messages (and will probably get another one soon). >This doesn't really have anything to do with SpamAssassin and >therefore is off-topic for this mailing list. Consider conversing >directly with the mailing list owner. I beg to differ. Misconfigured mailing lists are always on topic for a mailing list. If even the sa list doesn't follow the recommendations that we talk about on this list (changing the envelope-from to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) then how can we complain about other noobs who make the same mistake?
