On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 19:10 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Sunday 15 June 2008 12:03 pm, John Hardin wrote:
> > Folks:
> >
> > I tried posting this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it bounced...
> >
> > I'm seeing recent 419 spams (e.g. the ATM Card variant) making it
> > through SA lately. It hits BAYES_99, but no SARE rules.
> >
> > Are these rules defunct?
> >
> > Suggestion: grabbing Justin Mason's SOUGHT tools and using them against
> > a 419-specific corpus might be a really good way to keep the fraud
> > ruleset current without a lot of manual effort...
> 
> John, I assume you're talking about spam with a subject such as:
> 
> (RE:YOUR ATM-211 CARD UPDATE!!)

PAYMENT-CODE -(ATM-411)

Similar, yes. "We'll send you a $1500/day-capable ATM card..."

> Content analysis details:   (20.8 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------

>  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X3          Matches 3+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
>  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X4          Matches 4+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam

> Notice SARE rules were in fact hit.

They *did not* hit for me. I've published one of the messages here:
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/atm_spam_01.txt


-- 
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  I'm seriously considering getting one of those bright-orange prison
  overalls and stencilling PASSENGER on the back. Along with the paper
  slippers, I ought to be able to walk right through security.
                                             -- Brian Kantor in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 3 days until SWMBO's Birthday

Reply via email to