On Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 Mathias Homann wrote: > from sa-update -D: > > [12517] dbg: http: GET request, > http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/zmi/70_zmi_german.cf/200806051042.t >ar.gz.asc [12517] dbg: sha1: verification wanted: > 91eaa15f9a096c202a18b9f5f858fc25058643aa > [12517] dbg: sha1: verification result: > 91eaa15f9a096c202a18b9f5f858fc25058643aa > [12517] dbg: channel: populating temp content file > [12517] dbg: gpg: populating temp signature file > [12517] dbg: gpg: calling gpg > [12517] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature made Do 05 Jun 2008 10:50:57 CEST > using DSA key ID 856AA88A > [12517] dbg: gpg: [GNUPG:] ERRSIG 3C5C05EB856AA88A 17 2 00 1212655857 > 9 > [12517] dbg: gpg: [GNUPG:] NO_PUBKEY 3C5C05EB856AA88A > [12517] dbg: gpg: gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > error: GPG validation failed! > The update downloaded successfully, but it was not signed with a > trusted GPG > key. Instead, it was signed with the following keys: > > 856AA88A
Sorry that problem is on Daryl's side already, cannot influence it. Daryl, did ya see this? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
