>I read every document on their website, and saw zero mentions of this >feature. I can't research it further without getting the product here >to test, and I'm not suggesting that everyone do this -- just that >everyone read the information available.
http://www.snertsoft.com/smtp/smtpf/ >Look at testing results. Try it out. It's been 99% effective against >the botnets on a test system I enabled. Test results are nice to read but thats it. Moreover: how fast? How expensive? What about clustering? 99% effective with how many false positives etc. Does it fight backscatter? What I am saying is that there is more to it than this one figure. >> But please do not accuse me or others of not doing research if you > >are not sure. I did quite a bit of research and even asked for more > >information (which has not been provided yet). I have not said "it > >lacks feature x" while you incorrectly claim lacking "features" of > >other products. >People said specifically that mailchannels was doing "nothing more >than qmail does" which is clearly not true with even some basic >reading. This clearly indicates a lack of research. People: maybe. I did not do so. So if you want to accuse them, go ahead but leave me out of this loop. Please provide a link which describes what exactly they are doing. The things I could find justify "peoples" statements a bit since most of what I read can indeed be done with standard MTAs. Then they use a reputation network (in the commercial version only?) so they do not have to do the interesting tests themselve on the box. If I failed to see the magic of the product please enlighten me and please apologize. >I accept your accusation about my research IF you can please point me >to a document on FSL's website which addresses slowing down TCP >sessions. I can't find it. See above. From memory. Detailed description of all tests, options, error messages etc.
