> From: Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:18:26 +0200 > To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Subject: Re: MailChannels Traffic Control (fwd) > > * mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I respect you, but I feel sorry here. Tarpit and slowdown are know since >> a long time, so mailchannel bring nothing here (except marketing). In >> particular,"greet pause" has been implemented by some people. the fact >> that this is not common is not due to an implementation difficulty, but >> to the fact that the cost/benefit ratio is not very interesting. > > To be fair (I'm testing it right now): It's easy to get running. > Right now the Tarpit and slowdown features cannot be had in Postfix, > so I'm giving it a spin.
Tarpit in postfix for years, right? smtpd_soft_error_limit = 10 smtpd_hard_error_limit = 20 smtpd_error_sleep_time = 4m And if this box can't keep a valid/updated list of recipients, then it can contribute to the backscanner problem by sending DHA to the final MTA for it to bounce, right? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >|SECNAP Network Security Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer _________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com _________________________________________________________________________
