Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Hello Guys,
i got a message that was flagged with MISSING_SUBJECT rule. The
message has, among other headers:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 17:12:47 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
and rules are:
header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject
meta MISSING_SUBJECT !__HAS_SUBJECT
describe MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
MISSING_SUBJECT is, at least in my opinion, incorrect. The Subject
header is there, it do EXISTS. It's empty, OK .... but it's not MISSING.
should this empty subject really triggers MISSING_SUBJECT rule ??
yes. An empty subject is a missing one ;-p I mean that's not better than
omitting the subject header at once...
while ham sometimes has no subject (or has an empty subject), it doesn't
usually trigger other rules. so a 1.3 score isn't a problem (at least in
my experience).
I do sa-update once a day, so yes i'm running with the latest rules.
