> >>> Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the > >>> last months?
On 02.05.08 11:38, Joseph Brennan wrote: > Right. There's close to none now. Spam techniques come and go. does it push the extracted text back to SA so it could be used by e.g. bayes? This is how it imho should be used. (and imho the same for .pdf and/or .doc - extract text _and_ images from it, call OCR for images...) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. A day without sunshine is like, night.
