Joseph Brennan wrote:
what "own rules"? I'm talking that forwarding without changing sender's
address is broken already and I described how and why. SPS just
highlights
this problem and SRS is trying to solve it...
I don't see this necessity to change the sender address anywhere
in RFC 2821. In fact it differentiates between lists where you do
change the sender and aliases where you do not.
Let's see if I've got this right:
"There are practical problems with forwarding, whether you do SPF or not."
"No, there are no problems with forwarding, because the RFC says it's okay."
I'm sensing a disconnect here.
I assume everyone here has heard the joke about the difference between
theory and practice?
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
