On 13.04.08 15:45, Moritz Borgmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [smtp.X.com] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mx.B.com] -> [EMAIL > PROTECTED] [mx.A.com]
> mx.B.com is in trusted_networks, all machines at A.com are in > internal_networks. always_trust_envelope_sender is enabled since the trusted > relays do not rewrite envelope from. > > Now, this setup entails the well-known problem that if X.com publishes an > SPF record, SpamAssassin (3.2.4) spanks the message with SPF_FAIL since it > checks the first *external* relay (mx.B.com), not the first untrusted relay > against X.com's SPF policy. > Now, I see the following possibilities to solve/work around the problem. > First, the ones not viable (I believe that this situation is fairly common): > > 1) Don't forward - not an option. > > 2) Lobby B.com to implement SRS - hopeless. you rejected all the correct solutions... so you only can work around, not fix the problem... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors
