> >>>But back on topic... the OP has been joe-jobbed. > >mouss wrote: > >>he's not the only one... seems there's a lot of backscatter coming in > >>these days. > >> > >>Thanks for confirming that spf doesn't fix the problem.
SPF is designed to fix the problem, however as many other standards it works only if it's implemented. > Steve Prior wrote: > >The main problem with SPF is that most other servers out there don't > >check it even if you set your own records correctly. On 10.04.08 09:29, mouss wrote: > The question was whether spammers avoid joe jobbing addresses in domains > that have SPF set (except with a +all). it seems some of them do and > some don't. however some people can make false assumption that SPF is useless - it is not. It is always good to have SPF (and DKIM, of course) and the more servers will implement it, the more effe3ctive it will be. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
