On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm staring to see BATV use increasing. Has anyone thought about how
this effects whitelists, mta acls, etc? It looks like such things are
broken because if an end-user whitelists [EMAIL PROTECTED] and BATV has the
mail from as [EMAIL PROTECTED], then that whitelisting has no
effect. And since the BATV signature changes, they can't whitelist that
even if they new what batv signed address was for that sender.
Any thought about how to resolve this?
SA will probably need to be modified to de-BATV the sender address before
checking the whitelists. See if there's a bugzilla entry for that, and add
one if there isn't.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ["assault weapons"] ban is the moral equivalent of banning red
cars because they look too fast. -- Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 days until Thomas Jefferson's 265th Birthday
