> From: Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: ViaNet Internet Solutions > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:12:43 -0400 > To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Subject: Large-scale global Bayes tuning? > > Anyone have any suggestions on tuning a large global Bayes db for > stability and sanity? I've got my fingers in the pie of a moderately > large mail cluster, but I haven't yet found a Bayes configuration that's > sane and stable for any extended period. Wiping it completely about > once a week seems to provide "acceptable" filtering performance (we have > a number of addon rulesets), but I still see spam in my inbox with > BAYES_00 - a sure sign of a mistuned Bayes database. > Bayes on cluster begs the question: what if you didn't replicate the bayes tables, and left them server specific?
Since (depending on configurations) some of the servers might get 'spam only' (higher mx records), maybe just take one of the 'valid' bayes tables and manually copy it (sa-learn backup, sa-learn clear, restore) every week or so. Only way I could get a cluster of 9 to work right. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >|SECNAP Network Security Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer Charter member, ICSA labs anti-spam consortium _________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm). For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com _________________________________________________________________________
