> On Tuesday 01 April 2008 16:06:25 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > On Monday 31 March 2008 22:53:45 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > Such IP's are thus not designed to send mail directly to recipients - > > > > users have to send mail through mailserver with static IP that can > > > > autenticate them. > > > > On 31.03.08 22:06, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > > > True. The problem is, thats exactly what happened but SA matched the > > > sender anyway becouse he's in the received headers. > > > > iirc they only matched RDNS_DYNAMIC which means "reverse DNS looks like > > dynamic". That scores 0.1 points and only scores more in combination with > > other rules. However changing the DNS should help.
On 01.04.08 17:20, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > actually i mean SORBS and NJABL. they matched the sender. if we are still talking about mail from 66-211-213-17.velocity.net [66.211.213.17], they were not matched by any dynamic lists. your first mail indicates problem with different IP. and this IP only matches DRNS_DYNAMIC -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. M$ Win's are shit, do not use it !
