On 25.03.08 07:57, James Gray wrote: > Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of > SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's > practically useless
I don't find it useless. It works quite well > and if you are an unfortunate who ends up > incorrectly listed in it, good luck getting off it! it's mostly problem of bad DNS configuration. > Case at hand, the > company I work for purchased a /19 address block directly from APNIC > before anyone else had it (IOW, we were the first users of that block). > > We now have both our external mail IP's listed in SORBS_DUL despite the > fact the /24 they belong to, and the /24's on either side have NEVER > been part of a dynamic pool. what are those IPs and their DNS records? > SORBS refuse to delist them as our MX > records are different to these outgoing mail servers! FFS - we run > managed services for a number of ISP's why the hell would we *want* to > munge all our inbound and outbound mail through the same IP's?!? did you try discussing this problem on SORBS mailing lists? > Seriously folks, can we make SORBS_DUL optional and not "on by default" > in the general distribution? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
