aha -- that's being added by SpamAssassin alright, then, due to
the add_header line.

Are you using 1 global Bayes db, or per-user dbs?  if the latter, maybe
there just isn't enough training for bayes to be active? Try getting debug
logs from SpamAssassin -- they'll fill you in on the reason (although I'm
not sure if MDaemon allows you to do that).

--j.

Dave Koontz writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> 
>  The only indication is SA's X-Spam-DataBase: Bayes not run. header.
>  
> 
>  SpamAssassin doesn't add a header like that... what are you using:
>  spamd, MailScanner, amavisd?
> 
>  --j.
>   
> 
> I use a product called MDaemon, which has a windows port of SA. Perhaps my
> header mapping in local.cf is creating that header (see below).  Either
> way, there are no  BAYES_XX hits on most of  the messages processed.  I
> would say about a third are getting proper hits, all others have no BAYES
> tag at all.
> 
> clear_headers
> add_header all Report _REPORT_
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE(0.00)_  required=_REQD_
> tests=_TESTS_ shortcircuit=_SCTYPE_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_
> add_header spam Level _STARS(*)_
> add_header all DataBase _TOKENSUMMARY_
> add_header spam RBL _RBL_
> add_header all Hits _SPAMMYTOKENS_

Reply via email to