On 05/03/2008 2:54 PM, David Gibbs wrote: > Any thoughts on this? grep /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf and /usr/local/home/david/.spamassassin/user_prefs for "DEAR_SOMETHING".
Check to make sure that spamd isn't being started with any options that modify where it looks for rules. Try it without the rules being compiled (rm -rf /var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/). Daryl > David Gibbs wrote: >> I was watching my maillog this morning, trying to spot something else >> that wasn't quite working right when I noticed a bunch of errors >> similar to the following: >> >> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine >> DEAR_SOMETHING_one_line_body_te >> st redefined at >> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_phras >> es.cf, rule DEAR_SOMETHING, line 4, <GEN839> line 128. >> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine >> __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L_one_line_bod >> y_test redefined at >> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_d >> rugs.cf, rule __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L, line 6, <GEN839> line 128. >> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine >> __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS_one_l >> ine_body_test redefined at >> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_o >> rg/80_additional.cf, rule __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS, line 6, <GEN839> >> line 128. >> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine >> FB_HOMELOAN_one_line_body_test >> redefined at >> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.c >> f, rule FB_HOMELOAN, line 6, <GEN839> line 128. >> >> From what I can see in the logs, they started on 19-Feb. >> >> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 running on Perl version 5.8.8 >> in stock Fedora 8. >> >> I run the following command every 6 hours to update spamassassin: >> /usr/bin/sa-update && /usr/bin/sa-compile > /dev/null 2>/tmp/sa-com >> pile.log && kill -HUP $(cat /var/run/spamd.pid) >> >> When I run spamassassin --lint, no errors are reported. If it's >> useful, the output of spamassassin --lint -D is available at >> http://www.qtemp.net/spamassassin-lint.txt. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks! >> >> david >> >
