Philip Prindeville wrote:
Eric A. Hall wrote:
I'm guessing the URI analyzer needs to be smarter.
That's strangely appropriate to the issue I had with "calthurs.com".
It would be nice if this checker had an option to enforce checking
only of well-formed URL's (i.e. not "anything that might conceivably
be munged into a URL by the most ignorant of UA's")... something
requiring a protocol name (ftp:, http:, tftp:, etc.), a domain name,
and a path name (even if it's just slash).
See the discussion at:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5780
