On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, ram wrote: > > Allegedly 100% spam. Innocent until proven guilty, ect..... > > > > NUCLEAR NAMES, INC. > > I would love to block all domains with these , but to think of it what > is there to prevent them from getting themselves whitelisted by > registering "good domains"
There's a lot of difference between "not blacklisted" and "whitelisted". Not using a spam-friendly registrar does not mean they will get a pass, just that they won't get points for haiving used a spam-friendly registrar. > They can register one more domain with an innocent website (say a > wiki news site) etc Now they are less than 100% spammer > registrars Oh, I see what you mean. Adding some score for spam-friendly (not necessarily 100% spammy) is reasonable; using the registrar as a poison pill is not. Plus, what legitimate domain owner would wish to knowingly register their domain with a registrar that has a truly bad reputation? Plus, they can leave that registrar rather easily. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- If Microsoft made hammers, everyone would whine about how poorly screws were designed and about how they are hard to hammer in, and wonder why it takes so long to paint a wall using the hammer. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 days until the 41st anniversary of the loss of Apollo 1
