On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:34:51PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote: > I took a message and learned it as ham like this > cat email-with-headers | sa-learn --ham
(Useless use of cat!)
> Now I should expect the exact same email to be considered as ham. Correct?
Not necessarily. You should expect that the Bayes probability for the message
will be lower than it used to be, which isn't the same thing as SA thinking
the message is ham.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"Everyone lies Michael. The innocent lie because they don't want to be blamed
for something they didn't do, and the guilty lie because they have no other
choice. Find out why he's lying; the rest will take care of itself."
- Sinclair on Babylon 5
pgpauVzcDKdWh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
