Daniel J McDonald wrote: > >> It would be a harmless confusion, but if you specified: >> >> not_ok_locales se >> ok_locales en >> >> The ok_locales would do nothing at all. We'll have to document that >> *very* carefully. >> > > Maybe something like: > ok_locales !se all >
Hmm, that's a bit confusing to me, as the "all" would appear to be redundant (it's the default) Also, keep in mind that it's perfectly valid to have multiple ok_locales statements so: ok_locales !ja all ok_locales !ko all Would be confusing. Note: I also dropped the use of "se" here, as there is no "se" locale. ok_locales works on character sets, not languages, and Swedish is just 'en' to it.
