Michael Scheidell wrote: > If not for the -4 score for SA list on this it would have caught it > with these other rules: > You using any SAREs rules? > > MANGLED_CIALIS=2.5, SARE_OBFU_CIALIS=1.627, > URIBL_BLACK=1.955, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.501]
Well, two of those fired on my mispeeling of Cialis, and two fired on the URL being listed - when it was first let through SURBL didn't have the domain listed, so that leaves just URIBL_BLACK, but I'm not using www.uribl.com - maybe I should look into that. /Per Jessen, Zürich
