Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: > > I believe SA uses Bayes out of the box, but what I don't get is how > will Bayes know it's spam (to train on, versus ham) if there isn't > already a rule that flags it as spam somehow? I guess the RBL rules > will help. sa-learn --spam messagefile.txt
- SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spa... Jeff Chan
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious... Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spa... Theo Van Dinter
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious... Loren Wilton
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious... Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious... Matt Kettler
- Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spa... Justin Mason