> On Thursday 11 October 2007, Mark wrote: > >I'm new to the list, so I hope this is the right place. > > > >I am running my mail through procmail and separating my spamassassin > >into 3 groups depending on score: > > > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=[2-9][0-9] > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=[0-9][0-9] > > X-Spam-Status: Yes > > > >I reason that this must be in order of confidence. I have found that the > >first group (score>=20) contains more than half of my spam. The last > >group (score<10) contains about 1/10 of the spam. > > > >Would others agree that I can safely get procmail to trash the scores > >higher than 10?
On 11.10.07 05:23, Gene Heskett wrote: > I've been sending that stuff to /dev/null at >7, no false hits so far > according to the procmail.log. My bayes is fairly well trained. We (ISP I work for) had complaints when the messages scored over 7 were refused. I have even seen some messages that could be taken as false positives scoring a 11. However I take refusal with score over 10 as safe. Some people just have to fix their submission agents (usually PHP scripts who don't care about proper encoding and splitting lines) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Saving Private Ryan... Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
