John D. Hardin wrote: > Encoding the entire HTML body in base-64 is terribly > wasteful given how much it will expand the size of the content.
I agree, but being wasteful is not a distinctive sign of spam :-( /Per Jessen, Zürich
John D. Hardin wrote: > Encoding the entire HTML body in base-64 is terribly > wasteful given how much it will expand the size of the content.
I agree, but being wasteful is not a distinctive sign of spam :-( /Per Jessen, Zürich