Jeff Chan writes: > Quoting John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > R.Smits wrote: > > Spamcop: no. Don't use them as an MTA RBL. I'm leery of even using > > them as a SA RBL, but it's a very bad idea to use them as an MTA RBL > > (too many false positives). > > I was about to give the same answer....
actually Spamcop is looking pretty good these days, after some backend changes they made a few months back: spam: 53.8562% 225813 of 419287 messages ham: 0.0894% 71 of 79398 messages http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20071006-r582471-n/RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET/detail --j.
