> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote: > > > I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say, > > > Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:50:13 -0700 (PPT) > "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using a milter allows you to reject the message during the SMTP > > conversation. The value of that is, it's far better than > > generating a bounce message if you don't want to just silently > > discard spam, as it reduces (but does not eliminate!) joe-job > > fallout. On 26.09.07 18:06, Raquel wrote: > Thank you, John. I don't generate a bounce message anyway. That > would cause me more problems than it may even try to solve. ;-) The milter way the sender knows that mail was rejected, so they can complain. Spammers will usually not complain, but users using braindead mailers and sending broken messages with dozen of spam signs will. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. WinError #99999: Out of error messages.
