-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
jonathan schrieb: > I'm more concerned about the overhead of calling spamassassin over and > over from within amavis. Some suggest three or four times better > performance using spamc/d over calling the spamassassin command directly > (which is (i believe) what amavis does). Being able to handle Amavisd does not use the spamassassin command line binary, but: - --- cut --- package Amavis::SpamControl; [..] use Mail::SpamAssassin; - --- cut --- In the logfile of amavisd, you'll also see something like: | Aug 30 20:26:11 amavis[27896]: Module Mail::SpamAssassin 3.002000 > substantially more messages would help us quite a bit as our incoming > mail volume is rapidly on the rise. > > If I've got loadplugin commands in my various custom .cf files, will > these be properly heeded by spamd? If the custom .cf file are in a location that is read by your spamd process, yes. - -- Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG1wwqxbHw2nyi/okRAqq7AKCvhlJA1qdtBKcDDLbLfjbLROsbNQCfYNHk J/RhHuegL0cH2WRwOTPrknQ= =hZMI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
