On Tue, August 28, 2007 5:28 am, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> John Fleming writes:
>>> When I run sa-update, I have recently started to get this error
>>> which
>>> terminates the update run:
>>>
>>> [17894] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
>>> [17894] dbg: channel: update directory
>>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org
>>> [17894] dbg: channel: channel cf file
>>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
>>> [17894] dbg: channel: channel pre file
>>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.pre
>>> [17894] dbg: channel: metadata version = 555165
>>> can't resolve "wa9als.com" to address at
>>> /usr/lib/perl5/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line 751.
>>>
>>> I've looked at that line in Base.pm, but I have no idea what might
>>> be going
>>> on.  Can someone help point me in the right direction?  As they
>>> say, "It
>>> used to work."
>>
>> Interesting!  Could you open a bugzilla entry about this?  also,
>> attach the contents of /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> Don't bother with the bugzilla entry.  Net::DNS will give you this
> error
> if you try to use a hostname in your /etc/resolv.conf file rather than
> a
> name server IP as you should.
>
> In fact, I can reproduce this:
>
> [13973] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
> [13973] dbg: channel: update directory
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002/updates_spamassassin_org
> [13973] dbg: channel: channel cf file
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> [13973] dbg: channel: channel pre file
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002/updates_spamassassin_org.pre
> can't resolve "wa9als.com" to address at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
> line 751.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> nameserver wa9als.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
>
>
> Daryl
>

Yup, that was it - domain name in resolv.conf instead of IP.  But...
It used to work, and I wish I understood what changed.  No Bugzilla
filed.  THANKS A BUNCH for the answer!  - John



Reply via email to