From: Maciej Friedel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 02/14/07 Jonathan wrote:
>
> > http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam2.txt
>
> 0.0 BOTNET_NORDNS IP address has no PTR record
> 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
> 1.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
> [score: 0.5002]
> 5.0 BOTNET The submitting mail server looks like part of a Botnet
>
> i think botnet is a good idea
1.5 FH_RELAY_NODNS We could not determine your Reverse DNS
0.8 SARE_LWSHORTT BODY: SARE_LWSHORTT
1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3 BODY: Last week's hot stock scam
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.8750]
0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?211.48.218.5>]
3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[211.48.218.5 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
I think SARE and some network tests are even better (scores 11.5 with my
surprising Bayes :)
Giampaolo
>
> maciek
>
> --
> |_|0|_| Maciej Friedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |_|_|0| http://wwv.pl - usługi hostingowe
> |0|0|0| http://eprogram.pl - projektowanie stron www
