On Feb 10, 2007, at 14:38, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
How do you ever find FPs if you have so many TP to sort through that it's not even worth sorting through FP+TP to find the FP ? IMHO, that'd be why we assume that mails are ham rather than assume that they are spam.
I haven't found FP reviewing to be a big deal. In my latest SA based configuration, for example, I organize captures according to the quantity of tests a given message fails. The more tests are involved, the less a message needs to be double checked.
So as with other particulars, ease of use will depend on how well the approach is implemented.
Dan
