On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:05:26PM -0500, John W Mickevich wrote: > I am very new to bayes so some of my terms may be incorrect. But it would > appear that bayes has "learned" something incorrectly.
Not necessarily. It means that the tokens found in the message which are also
found in the DB are considered to be hammy overall. That's not necessarily
incorrect.
> I am not sure if something got autolearned as ham, etc. But, my question is
> how do I go about finding out exactly what within bayes is causing this
> email to be scored as BAYES_00? And more importantly, how do I "undo" it?
1) run the message through "spamassassin -D bayes" and you'll see the
token output w/ score information.
2) learn the spam message as spam.
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=4.9 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
FWIW, if you had left BAYES_00 with its default score, as opposed to
increasing it to -4.9, this mail would have been flagged as spam.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I'd rather see my sister in a whorehouse than my brother using windows."
- Sam Creasey
pgpwMoKv70FpP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
