i have SA 3.1.x branch head installed with FuzzyOCR 350rc1.

in --lint tests pass w/o error, and image-containing test messages
score as expected.

today, i received a spam msg with an attached gif.

it scored as spam, and was scored/delivered with report headers of,

 X-Spam-Status: score=8.6/4.0 autolearn=no
 X-Spam-Report:
          *  0.5 RELAY_JP Relayed through Japan
          *  1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= 
entry
          *  0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some 
mails
          *  1.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
          *      [score: 0.2209]
          *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
          *  1.2 SARE_GIF_ATTACH FULL: Email has a inline gif
          *  0.9 MY_CID_AND_CLOSING SARE cid and closing
          *  0.7 MY_CID_AND_STYLE SARE cid and style
          *  1.2 MY_CID_ARIAL2_CLOSING SARE cid arial2 closing
          *  1.1 MY_CID_ARIAL_STYLE SARE cid arial2 style
          *  0.7 MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2 SARE CID and Arial2

note -- *NO* FuzzyOCR tests/score.

if i then submit this same suspect message w,

        spamassassin -D -t -x < ./suspect_message

it returns,

 Content analysis details:   (34.1 points, 4.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.5 RELAY_JP               Relayed through Japan
  1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE       Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
  0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME     Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
  1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 [SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=dvabzg%40hvdaawn.nl&ip=222.228.73.146&receiver=my.domcain.com]
  1.8 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG
  1.2 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
                                                          [score: 0.2209]
  2.8 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1     BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  1.2 SARE_GIF_ATTACH        FULL: Email has a inline gif
  2.0 PART_CID_STOCK         Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)
  2.0 PART_CID_STOCK_LESS    Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID,
                                                          more specific)
  0.9 MY_CID_AND_CLOSING     SARE cid and closing
  0.7 MY_CID_AND_STYLE       SARE cid and style
  1.2 MY_CID_ARIAL2_CLOSING  SARE cid arial2 closing
  1.1 MY_CID_ARIAL_STYLE     SARE cid arial2 style
  0.7 MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2      SARE CID and Arial2
        16 FUZZY_OCR_KNOWN_HASH   BODY: Image with known hash
                                                          Words found:
                                                          "meridia" in 1 lines
                                                          "target" in 1 lines
                                                          "symbol" in 1 lines
                                                          "price" in 2 lines
                                                          "company" in 1 lines
                                                          "trade" in 2 lines
                                                          "recommendation" in 1 
lines
                                                          (13.5 word 
occurrences found)


which now additionaly INCLUDES the Fuzzyocr tests/scores,

        16 FUZZY_OCR_KNOWN_HASH   BODY: Image with known hash

as well as,

  1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  1.8 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG
  2.8 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1     BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1


given that,

        grep focr_autodisable_score FuzzyOcr.cf
                focr_autodisable_score 20

why in only one case does FuzzyOcr -- and these other tests -- score?

i've missed something obvious in either my SA or FuzzyOcr config(s), i
presume ... but what might it be?

thanks.

Reply via email to