Steve Thomas wrote: > Once again, Perkel clutters the SpamAssassin list with a non-SpamAssassin > discussion. ...Is anyone else getting tired of this? ...have nothing to do
> with SA. What's the point of having a > topical mailing list if nobody cares that the discussion is off-topic? Dhawal wrote: >Make that 2 of us. I for one would like to filter out all mails/threads >originated by perkel (yeah which would include this mail as well).. I couldn't disagree with these two people more. It is just these types of discussions which led to things like SURBL and fuzzyOCR... and yet we get so many OTHER repetitive discussions about thinks like **basic** SA setup, rules update procedures, etc... therefore, this stuff complained about is a fairly small percentage of the whole (maybe not for today, but overall it is). Marc Perkel is a bit eccentric and he and I are about as polar opposite in our political and "world-views" as two people can get... but I think he has some great ideas about spam filtering and I like the way that he "thinks outside the box". Rob McEwen PowerView Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
