Well, here's the debug to show that SPF is doing the wrong thing.
Rather, it's not doing the right thing -- it's not checking for an
authenticated session at all.
So... I guess this means I need to provide a patch to the SPF module?
Or will the author step up to the plate on this?
[2133] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=!172.16.12.22!, ip=209.157.140.144)
[2133] dbg: spf: query for /209.157.140.144/!172.16.12.22!: result:
unknown, comment: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=!172.16.12.22!&ip=209.157.140.144&receiver=triceratops.lizardarts.com:
domain of sender !172.16.12.22! does not exist
[2133] dbg: eval: all '*From' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2133] dbg: eval: trying Received header date for real time: 4 Dec 2006
22:31:23 -0800
[2133] dbg: eval: time_t from date=1165300283, rcvd= 4 Dec 2006 22:31:23
-0800
[2133] dbg: eval: all '*To' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2133] dbg: spf: found Envelope-From in first external Received header
[2133] dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=!172.16.12.22!,
ip=209.157.140.144, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[2133] dbg: spf: query for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/209.157.140.144/!172.16.12.22!: result: fail,
comment: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=jrhett%40lizardarts.com&ip=209.157.140.144&receiver=triceratops.lizardarts.com
[2133] dbg: rules: ran eval rule ALL_TRUSTED ======> got hit
[2133] dbg: rules: ran eval rule __ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH ======> got hit
[2133] dbg: spf: def_whitelist_from_spf: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not in
DEF_WHITELIST_FROM_SPF
[2133] dbg: rules: ran eval rule SPF_FAIL ======> got hit
[2133] dbg: eval: date chosen from message: Mon Dec 4 22:31:23 2006
[2133] dbg: spf: whitelist_from_spf: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not in
user's WHITELIST_FROM_SP
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
