Mark Martinec writes: > On Friday November 17 2006 21:24, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Besides, if there wasn't SA pluging, I would prefer a C/C++ version of SA. > > Wouldn't it run better? Wouldn't it be faster, wouldn't have a smaller > > memory footprint, better reclamation, better hooks for plugins etc? :) > > ...and buffer overruns, dangling pointers, poor maintainability, > playground for security holes. If SA were written in C, > I wouldn't let it examine mail being received from 'the wild'.
+1. having perl's taint mode, as well, makes a big difference. --j.
