On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Wolfgang Uhr wrote: > The test contains the examination of all links in the body. You > have to get the date of registration and to calculate the age of > this urls.
There is a URIBL for recently-registered domains - search the list archives for "day-old bread". > Of course for practal use you have to cache thoose whois-requests > onto a central server and to provide a complete series of mta's. I'm already doing this for a "spam-friendly registrar" plugin. http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/ > Mathias Leisi's opinion is that it is better to avoid a direct > spam-ham-decision but to score the age of an url. > > < 5 days -> 5 Points > < 10 days -> 3 Points > < 15 Tage -> 1 Point > > May be that this test is interesting for you. This does sound interesting, and would be a fairly minor change to the spam-friendly registrar plugin. I'll take a shot at it shortly. Pity you didn't post this Friday or I would have fiddled with it over the weekend... :) I'm thinking the plugin would implement a set of rules like URI_DOM_AGE_[5,10,15,20,25,30] and let the normal scoring and score customization methods apply. Comments? -- John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws... -- www.darwinawards.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tomorrow: Halloween
