On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:25:37 -0700, "Loren Wilton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Where do these guys all get on the same kick at the same time?
>> Or is it really ONE spammer who just got fired?
>>
>> Do they hold meetings about what topics to use next month
>> or what?
>
>I'd lay odds that it is either one spammer, or more likely one spam program.
>
>Back in the days of 900 porn phone numbers, there were companies selling get 
>rich quick schemes to suckers.  Someone ran a 900# service that gave out 
>astrology predictions and other such nonsense.  Suckers could sign up to run 
>their own 900# service and get 50% of the profits from the number.  All they 
>had to do was advertize in the "right places" so that they would get "lots 
>of business".  The main company scamming these dudes would even provide 
>recommendations for advertizing companies.
>
>What really happened is that there was one 900# on a rotary and a bunch of 
>extensions.  YOu were told to place an ad for whatever the service was, and 
>give the 900# and extension number.  If that extension got called, you got a 
>dime or whatever.  They would place ads in newspapers if you paid.  If you 
>looked at the proof for the entire page (not just your ad) you saw about 75 
>virtually identical ads, each with the same phone number and a different 
>extension number.  Needless to say the suckers placing the ads didn't get 
>any calls.
>
>I think the modern equivalent of this is that there is a spammer service 
>that will send spams out for you, all you have to do is pay them.  They will 
>even probably provide the drop sites that are advertized in the spam.  If 
>someone goes to the right site, the baby spammer gets a penny or dime or 
>whatever.  You probably sign up for this wonderful scheme with a web form 
>someplace, where all you have to do is enter your cc number to pay them for 
>a spam run with your code on it, and possibly the advertizing hook (the 
>subject line) of your choice.  As a matter of convenience, they probably 
>provide about 25 "different" subject lines to choose from.  (Just like the 
>900# people provided about 25 "different" but identical ads).
>
>It may be that nobody is ever stupid enough to look into the spam, so none 
>of the baby spammers ever get a single dime.  But the master spammer 
>probably got $100 or $2000 or some such from each baby spammer that thought 
>they were going to get rich quick.
>
>        Loren

...or maybe they just have the one brain. The one they borrow from the
mad cow when it's having a day off? ;-)

Reply via email to