If you do that you will get mugged, I promise. All you have to do is
bounce one to me and I'll crawl through the Ethernet cables, the
fiber optics, and all that crap so I can rip your throat out with
my bare teeth.
I hope that conveys the depths of depravity involved in the setup
you are proposing. There is no way on Earth you can track a spam
down to its original sender's ID and send it back.
Look up "Joe Job" on Google with and without the space. ALL the
headers in an Email which might give a hit to the original sender's
email address can be forged and almost without exception are forged
in spams.
{`,'} Bad BAD idea Robert.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin Users" <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:42
Subject: Ideas
Hi everyone, I am trying to setup a SPAM server to process incoming
email and then send it back to the original sender.
I have setup Spamassassin and Postfix (latest version), and they are
working great. I am trying to figure out how to get Postfix to
automatically send the "processed" e-mail back to the sender with all of
the processed info in it like below, any ideas??
Thanks in advance
Robert
Content analysis details: (1.2 points, -5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.1 FH_MSGID_HUGE_40 FH_MSGID_HUGE_40
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.6 HTML_SHORT_LENGTH BODY: HTML is extremely short
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in
abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
The original message was not completely plain text.
