(a) SpamAssassin is written in perl. Byte-ordering is not an issue ;) (b) our core testing infrastructure -- http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/ , http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8011/ -- runs on this:
: jm 1...; uname -a SunOS spamassassin.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_118855-15 i86pc i386 i86pc looks like x86 to me.... --j. Sietse van Zanen writes: > There are profound differences between the SPARC and X86 architectures, even > within the Solaris OS. One of these is an endian difference. > > >>From your comment I conclude, that you have not ported spamassassin to X86, > >>but only to SPARC. > It therefore will likely not work on X86. Anyway you should state that it is > unsupported and that if anyone would get it to work on S10-X86 should inform > the community about it. > > -Sietse > > > > From: Theo Van Dinter > Sent: Wed 06-Sep-06 15:51 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Spamassassin on Solaris 10 x86 > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Pascal Maes wrote: > > Anybody else is using Spamassassin on a solaris 10 x86 box ? > > What you showed was a bunch of Amavis debug output. Run a message through > "spamassassin" or "spamd" and see if there's an issue. > > In development, we're running SA on Solaris 10 (SPARC, not x86) and it works > fine. > > -- > Randomly Generated Tagline: > "I came here to eat carrots and kick butt, and I'm all out of carrots." > - One Must Fall:2097
