Bill Landry wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "qqqq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Here's how you might use the lists if you have Exim:
|
| # Mark it White
| warn dnslists = hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1
| set acl_c1 = white - dnswl - $sender_fullhost
| # Mark it Yellow
| warn dnslists = hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.3
| set acl_c1 = yellow - $sender_fullhost
|
| # Using the Black List
| deny dnslists = hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2
|
| # Other Blacklists
| deny !dnslists = hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1,127.0.0.3
| dnslists =
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org/<;$sender_host_address;$sender_address_domain :\
| nomail.rhsbl.sorbs.net/$sender_address_domain :
cbl.abuseat.org :\
| list.dsbl.org : web.dnsbl.sorbs.net : socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net :\
| http.dnsbl.sorbs.net
Mark,
Since I don't use Exim, do you know how I can implement this to call
from SA?
Something like this would work:
header __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER eval:check_rbl('JMFILTER',
'hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com.')
describe __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER Sender listed in JMFILTER
tflags __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER net
header RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W eval:check_rbl_sub('JMFILTER', '127.0.0.1')
describe RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W Sender listed in JMFILTER-WHITE
tflags RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W net nice
score RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W -1.5
header RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_B eval:check_rbl_sub('JMFILTER', '127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_B Sender listed in JMFILTER-BLACK
tflags RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_B net
score RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_B 1.0
header RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_Y eval:check_rbl_sub('JMFILTER', '127.0.0.3')
describe RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_Y Sender listed in JMFILTER-YELLOW
tflags RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_Y net nice
score RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_Y -0.5
Thanks Bill,
Yellow listing shouldn't get a score. It should be used in a way that
says not to run and IP based black lists because the black list will be
wrong. It's for avoiding false positives. I think that the white score
could be -5. I'm confident in that list.
