Scott Ryan wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 09:40, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote with regard to -
Re: Missing Checks :
Scott Ryan wrote:
What was be the difference in configs between two servers if when
scanning the same message 1 marks it as not spam and only does the
following checks: dbg: check: tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE
Yet the other machine does these checks and marks as spam:
dbg: check:
tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,TVD_FW_GRA
PHIC_ID3
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET: enable network checks on the first server
Network checks were already enabled.
TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID3: use sa-update on the first server
Thanks, this check was now done along with the RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET check.
[17166] dbg: check:
tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
And was subsequently trapped.
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET isn't a rule new to the set available via
sa-update, so your previous run either suffered from a DNS timeout or
intermittent failure.
Daryl
