Anyone serious about stopping SPAM should not use SpamCop. They have no
real checking method, it's like AOL's spam blocking method...they just
let users submit what they think is spam and then block it. It's
pointless. There's not even a way to contact anyone at SpamCop to fix a
falsely listed server or what not.
They are a joke.
John Rudd wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Zinski, Steve wrote:
I use SpamCop to report my spam.
I use the SpamHaus RBL as a first line of defense then I use
SpamAssassin to catch the rest of the spam coming to my server.
Am I wasting my time? Should I just delete low-scoring spam and let the
honeypots harvest and report to the various RBLs, or should I keep
reporting spam via SpamCop (which wastes a lot of my time).
In my experience, SpamCop is a colossal waste of _everything_ it
uses. Time, space, energy, matter, etc.
But that's just "in my experience". YMMV.
