We have been waiting patiently to resolve the swapping problem caused by SA 3.0.x's forking algorithms.  I have been watching anxiously over the progress of 3.1 and am very encouraged about the new pre-forking code.

However, we're have a real need to get SA installed now for "the never-ending battle".  This would be the first time we've installed the product into production.

I downloaded and configured a nightly build yesterday and found it to work quite well.  We're contemplating using it in production to help lighten our load of managing the floods of junk mail.

I know from watching that 3.1 might be a ways off, and am wondering if based on anyone's experience whether running an interim build is a good idea or not?  I understand the risks of doing this in general, just wondering if the SA tree and development cycle is any more or less likely to give us problems.

Thanks in advance.

Reply via email to