Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> writes: > On 2026-04-02 12:34:05 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2026-04-01 18:16:49 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> > Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, >> > > >> > > DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20, >> > > >> > > HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, >> > > SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL autolearn=no >> > > autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 >> >> [...] >> > - File a complaint with MSPIKE, whoever they are. See how that goes. >> > See who else comments about MSPIKE. Report back. This could lead >> > to removing them from the default rules, if they're super bad, or >> > who knows what else. But you have to complain. Any list can have a >> > problem, and if it's fixed fast, then that's the best we can hope >> > for. >> >> I've just sent a request via <https://mailspike.io/contact_us>. > > Following this request, I've just received a mail saying that the IP > is no longer listed on MailSpike. However, "spamassassin -t" gives > in particular: > > 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL > blocklist > [URI: seoserviceweb.com] > 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) > [79.137.75.80 listed in wl.mailspike.net] > 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist > [URI: seoserviceweb.com] > 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders > > At least, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 is no longer present.
I suspect this address sends mostly ham and some spam, and this listing status is not necessarily crazy. Note that SA does not give any real negative points for H3 or WL (and WL is just meta for H[345]). It's only H5 that is granted -1.0. So this seems like a pretty ok response, with a minus for miscommunicating "no longer in H5" vs "no longer listed". https://mailspike.io/ip_verify/usage I was surprised to see that our MSPIKE rules do not have L1 or H1, and I didn't know about ZBI, which is being on Z (spam wave) but not being on L3 to L5. The scores (50_scores.cf) are score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI 2.7 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 2.5 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 1.7 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 0.9 [L2 is 0.001 from 72_scores] score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.01 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 -0.01 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 -1.0 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 0.01 score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 So all in all after investigating I am not upset about mailspike.
